Diversity Visa (DV) 2017 Lottery Results Now Available

Beginning May 3, 2016, applicants for the DV-2017 lottery may enter their confirmation information into the DV Entrant Status Check to see if they have been selected for the green card lottery. DV-2017 applicants should keep their confirmation number until at least September 30, 2017 and continue to check the status periodically as more selections may be made throughout the year.

Posted in Updates

FY 2017 H-1B Cap Timeline — Have You Been Selected?

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced yesterday that it has completed its data entry of cap-subject H-1B petitions for fiscal year 2017. This means that many lucky applicants have received or will receive their H-1B receipt notice soon. We anticipate that all H-1B receipts will be sent out by May 12, although, in 2015, receipts trickled in as late as June. For those lucky F-1/OPT applicants who were eligible for cap-gap extension, remember to get your “cap-gap I-20” from your school.

See below for the timeline of this season’s H-1B madness.

May 2, 2016 USCIS announced that it has completed data entry of fiscal year 2017 H-1B cap-subject petitions.

USCIS will now begin returning all H-1B cap-subject petitions that were not selected. Due to the high volume of filings, USCIS is unable to provide a definite time frame for returning these petitions. USCIS asks petitioners not to inquire about the status of submitted cap-subject petitions until they receive a receipt notice or an unselected petition is returned. USCIS will issue an announcement once all the unselected petitions have been returned.

Additionally, USCIS is transferring some Form I-129 H-1B cap subject petitions from the Vermont Service Center to the California Service Center to balance the distribution of cap cases. If your case is transferred, you will receive notification in the mail.

April 9, 2016 USCIS conducted the computer-generated random selection process (or lottery) to select H-1B petitions to meet the 65,000 general cap and the 20,000 advanced degree cap.

[USCIS] conducted the selection process for the advanced degree exemption first. All unselected advanced degree petitions then became part of the random selection process for the 65,000 limit.

April 7, 2016 USCIS announced that it received enough H-1B petitions to meet the statutory cap of 65,000 (general cap), as well as the master’s cap of 20,000, for fiscal year (FY) 2017

USCIS received over 236,000 H-1B petitions during the filing period, which began April 1, including petitions filed for the advanced degree exemption.

Applicants who are not selected in the H-1B lottery will receive their entire H-1B petition, together with the government filing fees, back from USCIS. Given the high volume of applications, H-1B rejections will likely only be received in June or July.

With 236,000 applications received and only 85,000 H-1B visas available, its about a 25% chance of being selected for applicants who don’t have a qualifying U.S. advanced degree. As depressing as it may be, the historical trend in the last few years shows that USCIS received H-1B applications that well exceed the number of H-1B visas within the first week of the H-1B filing period.

In the meantime, “unlucky” applicants who missed out should consider some of the alternative visa options:

  • FIVE lucky countries have free-trade agreements with the United States: Candidates from Australia (E-3), Canada (TN NAFTA), Mexico (TN NAFTA), Chile (H-1B1) and Singapore (H-1B1) may have alternative visa options based on these free trade agreements.
  • Professionals working in the arts, motion pictures and television and entertainment industries may qualify for an O or P visa (e.g. VFX artists, graphic designers, architects, animators, technical directors, fashion designers, art directors, creative directors, curators, chefs, industrial designers, journalists, writers, producers, etc.).
  • Scientists and researchers may qualify for J or O visas.
  • Athletes may qualify for an O or P visa.
  • Entrepreneurs and investors may qualify for an E-1 or E-2 visa.
  • Interns and trainees may qualify for J-1s or H-3 visas.
  • Interns and entry-level professionals in the arts and entertainment industry may qualify as “essential support personnel” (O-2 or P-1S) to an O-1 principal.
  • Multinational executives, managers and specialized knowledge professionals working for global companies may qualify for L-1 visas.
  • Cap-exempt institutions, such as universities, nonprofits affiliated with universities, and nonprofit research organizations are not subject to the H-1B cap and can files as many H-1B applications as they like at any time.
  • Consider going back to school for an advanced degree or specialized certificate program.
  • Work remotely from a different country and apply for an H-1B in the following year.


Posted in Updates

STEM OPT: New Rule

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is amending its F-1 nonimmigrant student visa regulations on optional practical training (OPT) for certain students with degrees in science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) from U.S. institutions of higher education.

Specifically, the final rule allows such F-1 STEM students who have elected to pursue 12 months of OPT in the United States to extend the OPT period by 24 months (STEM OPT extension). This 24-month extension effectively replaces the 17-month STEM OPT extension previously available to certain STEM students. The rule also increases oversight over STEM OPT extensions by, among other things, requiring the implementation of formal training plans by employers, adding wage and other protections for STEM OPT students and U.S. workers, and allowing extensions only to students with degrees from accredited schools. As with the prior 17-month STEM OPT extension, the rule authorizes STEM OPT extensions only for students employed by employers who participate in E-Verify.

The rule also includes the “Cap-Gap” relief for any F-1 student with a timely filed H-1B petition and request for change of status. This rule is effective May 10, 2016. A copy of the DHS final rule is available below. Stay tuned for more details.

** This post has been updated to include a copy of the final rule published on March 11, 2016.

Posted in Updates

Update On Visa Waiver Changes

Travelers planning to visit the United States are already facing surprises based on the new restrictions of the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) that were implemented as part of the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act.

Based on the new restrictions, individuals who have been present in Iraq, Syria, Iran, or Sudan (or other countries designated by DHS as supporting terrorism or “of concern”) at any time on or after March 1, 2011, are not eligible to participate in the VWP. The new law exempts those performing military service in the armed forces of a VWP country or those carrying out official duties in a full-time capacity in the employment of a VWP country government. U.S. officials have identified about 1,600 individuals who traveled to these four countries but for now, will not be revoking these ESTA clearances. The United States will wait until these individuals arrive at ports-of-entry to process them and will determine at that time, whether these individuals qualify for an exemption.

The new law also excludes from the VWP individuals who are nationals of Iraq, Syria, Iran, or Sudan. Nationality typically depends on the laws of the designated country, so it is important to note that an individual may be a national of a particular country, even if he or she has never resided in that country and/or does not have a passport issued by that country. For example, a UK citizen with a UK passport who was born in Iran, is now likely unable to use the Visa Waiver Program. In fact, on Tuesday, January 19, 2016, a BBC journalist with dual British-Iranian citizenship was prevented from boarding a plane traveling from London to New Jersey. U.S. officials have confirmed that it has identified about 16,000 individuals with ESTA clearances who have dual nationality. Those individuals will be sent emails revoking their ESTA clearance. Most came from the following countries: Germany, France, UK, Sweden, Australia.

In addition, individuals who are no longer eligible for the VWP will have the opportunity to apply for a waiver at a port-of-entry, but only if DHS finds that it would be in the law enforcement or national security interests of the United States.

Individuals impacted by these changes would now have to apply for a traditional B-1/B-2 visa at a U.S. embassy or consulate in their home country.

For more information, please see the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act Frequently Asked Questions.

Posted in Updates

“240-Day Rule” Expansion, H-1B & L-1 Filing Fees, Visa Waiver Changes & More

E-3, H-1B1 and CW-1 Nonimmigrants Now Eligible for “240-Day” Rule

On January 13, 2016, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it has amended its regulations to provide relief for nonimmigrants in H-1B1 (specialty occupations from Chile, Singapore), E-3 (specialty occupations from Australia) and CW-1 (transitional workers in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands) visa classifications, who file an extension of status in a timely manner. This is great news!!

Current regulations provide most nonimmigrant visa classifications (H-1B, L-1, O-1, TN, etc.), with an automatic 240 days of continued work authorization when an extension petition is filed before the nonimmigrant visa expires. This means that as long as the extension with the same employer is “timely filed” and pending, the nonimmigrant employee may continue to work for his or her employer after the current status expires, for up to 240 days or the date of denial, whichever is earlier. Unfortunately, this “240-day” rule did not apply to H-1B1, E-3 and CW-1 categories until now. Before this amendment, extensions for nonimmigrants in these classifications had to be approved before the expiration date in order to continue working. This often created hardship for employers and foreign nationals as USCIS often takes 3-5 months to adjudicate extension petitions. In the past, employers had to take foreign nationals off payroll. Unfortunately, there is still no option to use the premium processing service in these categories.

New Law Increases H-1B and L-1 Petition Fees

On January 12, 2016, USCIS also announced that there will be an increase in filing fees for certain employers filing H-1B and L-1 visa petitions in accordance with the Consolidated Appropriation Act, 2016, signed by the President on December 18, 2015. Below is an outline of this new requirement.

  • Type of petitioners: Employers who employ 50 or more employees in the United States and with more than 50% of those employees are in H-1B or L-1 nonimmigrant status
  • Nonimmigrant Visa (NIV) classification: H-1B or L-1A or L-1B
  • Type of petition: Initial petition by the employer (change of status, consular processing, and change of employer)
  • Required fee: $4,000 for H-1B petitions and $4,500 for L-1 petitions
  • When to submit: At the time of filing (For those cases filed, between December 18, 2015 and February 11, 2016, that do not include the required fees, USCIS will issue a Request for Evidencd (RFE) to determine whether the additional fee applies to the petition. USCIS advises that petitioners should wait to respond to the RFE before sending in the additional fee or an explanation of why the new fee does not apply.)
  • Effective date: December 18, 2015 through September 30, 2025. (This new rule applies to petitions filed or postmarked on or after December 18, 2015.)

Visa Waiver Updates

In addition, the new law also includes provisions that add certain restrictions to the Visa Waiver Program (VWP). Among other things, the foreign traveler must:

  • have an electronic passport as of April 1, 2016
  • not have traveled to Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria or other other country designated to have been supporting acts of terrorism
  • not be a National of Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria or any other country designated to have been supporting acts of terrorism (even if a National of another VWP country)

VWP travelers who have traveled to Iran, Iraq, Sudan or Syria or other countries designated to have supported acts of terrorism will have to apply for a traditional B-1/B-2 visitor visa at a U.S. embassy abroad.

EB-1 Outstanding Professors / Researchers Update

In the same January 15, 2016 revised regulation, employers filing Outstanding Professor or Researcher petitions in the EB-1 category may now submit “comparable evidence in petitions and are not limited to the specific criteria.

Posted in Updates

USCIS Backtracks and Modifies Revised Visa Bulletin Procedures

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today that beginning with the Visa Bulletin for November 2015, USCIS will make a determination each month on whether there are more immigrant visas available for the fiscal year than there are known applicants for such visas. If immigrant visas are available, applicants may use the “Dates for Filing Visa Applications” chart as the basis for filing their I-485 adjustment of status applications. Otherwise, the “Application Final Action Dates” chart will be used in determining when individuals may file their adjustment of status applications. USCIS will make such determination available to applicants every month within one week from the publication of the new Visa Bulletin by the State Department, through the new Visa Bulletin information web page.

This latest instruction is in contrast with USCIS’ original announcement on September 9, 2015, which revised the immigrant visa application procedures and instructed applicants to use the “Dates for Filing Visa Application” chart as a priority date reference when filing I-485 adjustment of status application.

Posted in Updates

Court Denies Relief Sought In Visa Bulletin Lawsuit

On October 6, 2015, a Federal Court in Washington denied the emergency motion for Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) filed on September 28, 2015 in a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit came after the U.S. Department of State (DOS) published a revised Visa Bulletin for October 2015 a few days before October 1 — when the Visa Bulletin becomes effective.

The court rules:

When considering the balance of equities and the public interest in this matter, the Court finds Defendants’ arguments the more persuasive. Plaintiffs essentially reiterate their case, arguing that Defendants actions were abrupt and unlawful, that “the government cannot claim to suffer any hardship,” and that “the government’s actions in this case threaten to permanently undermine the regulated community’s ability to rely on the Visa Bulletin.” In Response, Defendants argue “[t]he public interest favors applying federal law correctly,” that “it is contrary to the public interest and the law to require an executive agency to act in a manner that exceeds its statutory authority,” and that “should a temporary restraining order be granted and should the Government then succeed in litigation, it would have to incur the substantial cost and burden returning applications.” Most persuasively, however, is Defendants’ argument that “it is in the public’s interest that the agency has the authority to update its guidance when necessary.” Id. Given the claim that the Revised Visa Bulletin corrected a statement contrary to statutory authority, the Court finds that the public interest lies in denying this Motion and that Plaintiffs fail to meet their burden on this element.

While the Court appreciates the confusion caused by the two Visa Bulletins published in September and the potentially wasted expenses Plaintiffs incurred as a result, because Plaintiffs fail to meet the critical elements for a temporary restraining order at this time, the Court cannot issue injunctive relief.

Accordingly, the Court hereby finds and ORDERS that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED.

Posted in Updates

All Embassies and Consulates Will Be Closed on October 9, 2015

On Friday, October 9, 2015, consular operations at all embassies and consulates will be closed to the public due to a planned consular systems upgrade. Application Service Centers (ASCs) connected to certain posts may also be affected by the systems upgrade. Individuals who have an appointment scheduled for that date will be contacted to reschedule. Instructions for emergency requests for appointment will be provided by individual posts. Please make sure to check individual post websites for additional information.

Posted in Updates

Lawsuit Seeks to Reinstate the Original Visa Bulletin for October 2015

On September 28, 2015, a class action lawsuit was filed against the U.S. Department of State (DOS) and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) over last minute changes to the Visa Bulletin for October 2015.

In Mehta v. DOS, plaintiffs have asked the court to strike down the revised September 25, 2015 Visa Bulletin and to compel USCIS to accept I-485 adjustment of status applications based on the original September 9, 2015 Visa Bulletin. The lawsuit states:

This case is about what happens when thousands of law-abiding, highly skilled immigrants spend millions of dollars preparing to apply for green cards in reasonable reliance on an agency’s binding policy statement, only to find out at the last minute that a hapless federal bureaucracy has abruptly, inexplicably, and arbitrarily reneged on its promise.

The table below shows the “Dates of Filing” affected by the revised Visa Bulletin for October 2015.

(SEP 9, 2015)
(SEP 25, 2015)
EB-2 China 1 MAY 2014 1 JAN 2013 1 year, 5 months
EB-2 India 1 JUL 2011 1 JUL 2009 2 years
EB-3 Philippines 1 JAN 2015 1 JAN 2010 5 years
FB-1 Mexico 1 JUL 1995 1 APR 1995 3 months
FB-3 Mexico 1 OCT 1996 1 MAY 1995 1 year, 5 months


Posted in Updates

Government Miscalculation Leaves Many Visa Applicants Feeling Cheated

We are disappointed to report that many applicants will continue to face lengthy waits before they can submit their I-485 adjustment of status applications for permanent residence.

On September 25, 2015, the U.S. Department of State (DOS) published a revised Visa Bulletin for October 2015, rolling back the “Dates for Filing” for several visa categories. This “Revised September 25, 2015” Visa Bulletin supersedes the previous Visa Bulletin for October 2015, which was originally published on September 9, 2015.

Please note that the following “Dates for Filing” have changed:

(SEP 9, 2015)
(SEP 25, 2015)
EB-2 China 1 MAY 2014 1 JAN 2013 1 year, 5 months
EB-2 India 1 JUL 2011 1 JUL 2009 2 years
EB-3 Philippines 1 JAN 2015 1 JAN 2010 5 years
FB-1 Mexico 1 JUL 1995 1 APR 1995 3 months
FB-3 Mexico 1 OCT 1996 1 MAY 1995 1 year, 5 months

Therefore, individuals who fall under the above-referenced categories will only be permitted to file for adjustment of status in the month of October if they have a priority date that is earlier than the NEW Filing Date listed in the revised September 25, 2015 Visa Bulletin.

According to a statement released by the President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA):

For people who have been patiently waiting in line and are stuck in the long visa backlogs emblematic of the U.S. legal immigration system, this is yet another huge letdown. So many people spent time and money getting their applications ready to file and now they are told, due to government miscalculation, that they can’t file after all. This mistake affects real people: individuals who have already made important life decisions based on previously released information published by the government two weeks ago. They now, once again, face extended delays before they can get travel documents and employment authorization. In the long run, the announced changes to the visa bulletin are improvements to the system that will eventually help thousands of families and individuals to plan and get on with their futures, but in the short run this miscalculation has serious consequences. Frankly, they deserve better, and the Administration should be ashamed and embarrassed at the harm this mistake has caused.

A full comparison of the September 9, 2015 dates to the September 25, 2015 dates is available here.

Posted in Updates